Law of Implicit Unity
This article is about the central rule in Andrew Lehti's Canonical Order of Operations. For the full framework, see Canonical Order of Operations.
| Law of Implicit Unity | |
|---|---|
| Framework | Canonical Order of Operations |
| Author | Andrew Lehti |
| Core expression | |
| Primary use | Parentheses, powers, negative-base interpretation, and root notation |
The Law of Implicit Unity is the central rule of the Canonical Order of Operations (COO). It states that every number or variable is implicitly raised to the first power, even when the exponent is not written.
In ordinary algebra, is standard. COO extends the interpretive role of this rule by using it to determine how parenthesized bases and negative signs should behave under exponentiation.
Definition
The law states that any base may be read as having an implicit exponent of one:
For Lehti, this rule is not only a simplification. It is the mechanism by which parentheses should be removed in exponent expressions.
Negative-base application
The distinctive COO application occurs with negative expressions. COO proposes:
This differs from conventional algebra, where treats the negative sign as part of the parenthesized base. Under conventional rules, . Under COO, the negative sign remains external after implicit unity is applied.
Role in the Canonical Order
The Law of Implicit Unity supports several COO claims:
- every written base has an explicit exponent structure;
- parentheses around a base can be removed through exponent laws;
- negative signs should be separated from the magnitude being exponentiated;
- roots should be expressed through fractional exponents;
- radical notation should be replaced by exponent notation.
Examples
| Expression | COO expansion |
|---|---|
Contrast with standard algebra
The law's first statement, , is not controversial by itself. The controversy lies in COO's use of it to reinterpret negative bases. This use changes the conventional result of expressions such as .
| Expression | Standard interpretation | COO interpretation |
|---|---|---|
Because of this departure, the Law of Implicit Unity must be read as part of COO, not as a statement of standard algebraic convention.